Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add a code of conduct. #6036

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 25, 2019
Merged

Add a code of conduct. #6036

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 25, 2019

Conversation

cmnbroad
Copy link
Collaborator

@cmnbroad cmnbroad commented Jul 12, 2019 •
edited
Loading

This is the same one we use in htsjdk, but references [email protected] (is there a better alternative ?).

@cmnbroad
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@bhanugandham per our discussion.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 12, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #6036 into master will decrease coverage by 6.836%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##              master     #6036       +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage     87.212%   80.376%   -6.836%     
+ Complexity     32721     31022     -1699     
===============================================
  Files           2011      2011               
  Lines         150954    150967       +13     
  Branches       16133     16134        +1     
===============================================
- Hits          131650    121341    -10309     
- Misses         13692     24157    +10465     
+ Partials        5612      5469      -143
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...dorientation/CollectF1R2CountsIntegrationTest.java 0.714% <0%> (-99.286%) 1% <0%> (-14%)
...kers/filters/VariantFiltrationIntegrationTest.java 0.826% <0%> (-99.174%) 1% <0%> (-25%)
...ers/vqsr/FilterVariantTranchesIntegrationTest.java 0.917% <0%> (-99.083%) 1% <0%> (-6%)
.../walkers/bqsr/BaseRecalibratorIntegrationTest.java 1.031% <0%> (-98.969%) 1% <0%> (-7%)
...s/variantutils/VariantsToTableIntegrationTest.java 1.042% <0%> (-98.958%) 1% <0%> (-21%)
...on/FindBreakpointEvidenceSparkIntegrationTest.java 1.754% <0%> (-98.246%) 1% <0%> (-6%)
...park/pipelines/CountReadsSparkIntegrationTest.java 1.786% <0%> (-98.214%) 1% <0%> (-8%)
...bender/tools/spark/PileupSparkIntegrationTest.java 2.041% <0%> (-97.959%) 2% <0%> (-13%)
...tute/hellbender/tools/FlagStatIntegrationTest.java 2.083% <0%> (-97.917%) 1% <0%> (-5%)
...ariationDiscoveryPipelineSparkIntegrationTest.java 1.064% <0%> (-97.872%) 1% <0%> (-13%)
... and 159 more

lbergelson
lbergelson reviewed Jul 14, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@lbergelson lbergelson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

gatk-dev-public is a bad email address to use because its a publicly visible group. It's not confidential at all.

@bhanugandham
Copy link
Contributor

bhanugandham commented Jul 23, 2019 •
edited
Loading

@droazen and @lbergelson the support team created an email address([email protected]) to report "code of conduct" complaints. These complaints will be reported on zendesk and can be viewed by the support team. Does that work?

@bhanugandham bhanugandham requested a review from droazen July 23, 2019 20:50
@cmnbroad
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@lbergelson Can you review/merge ? thx.

@lbergelson lbergelson merged commit 1f31a80 into master Jul 25, 2019
@lbergelson lbergelson deleted the cn_code_of_conduct branch July 25, 2019 20:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@lbergelson lbergelson lbergelson approved these changes

@droazen droazen Awaiting requested review from droazen

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@cmnbroad @bhanugandham @lbergelson